Who the hell?Name: Kurt
Age: 24 (actual); 5-500 (mental)
Searchify...Search zee archives:
Latest obscenities...If you liked WWJD, then you'll love WIJD...
Friday, July 23 2010 UK lawmakers fail at internets, lawmaking Sunday, May 16 2010 Procrastination is everywhere Tuesday, May 11 2010 E-stripsearching at the airport Friday, February 19 2010 Kellogg donates Phelps-labeled cereal to food bank; I launch Potheads 4 Hunger Thursday, March 12 2009 High school play banned for sex and drugs to go on at local college Wednesday, March 4 2009 Michael Phelps is not a role model, so quit treating him like one Friday, February 6 2009 Useless polls...What are your last words before you die most likely going to be?
Archives ArchivesCategories...Calendar
Blog Administration |
Saturday, September 8. 2007Who was more evil: the empire or the rebellion?Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
To paraphrase Vader, "Your lack of perspective disturbs me." You say:
"I don't applaud the Emperor's subversive tactics by any means," and yet your post would seem to imply that it's unacceptable to bring down this repressive fascist regime enslaving the galaxy unless it can be done with totally clean hands. The Galactic Civil War is not the Civil Rights Movement, and revolution often necessitates difficult choices, but that doesn't mean that the Empire has some inherent moral superiority because it prevails based on a purely mathematical consideration. Motivation and context are just as important as outcomes. By your logic, if a hypothetical "Man in the High Castle" Nazi regime had taken over America, a hypothetical American resistance would have been morally unjustified in fighting back unless it could ensure that only high Nazi officials would be killed. I find it rather simplistic to simply dismiss the Rebels as terrorists without considering the fact that the Empire has given them no alternatives. Granted, this is probably impossible given its constitution, but that's irrelevant. What exactly makes the Empire so righteous? Even if they haven't killed anyone unnecessarily, (*Cough* Jedi Purge *Cough*) the fact that they wield power solely in their own name makes them evil, and a revolution fighting for representative democracy is inherently good, or at least has a higher burden of proof for me to be convinced of their perfidy. Also, I am not actually as nerdy about Star Wars as this may make me seem, but I think the larger issues raised by this post are important enough to justify a response. As this is not Policy Debate, I hope you'll forgive me for not supplying a point-by-point refutation. As a quick note, the rebellion's true goals are never clear. In fact, we only hear Leia referred to as "Princess," which would suggest that their goal might be a monarchy. Assuming traditional monarchy structure (after all, this is "a long time ago,"), the rebellion merely advocates trading one regime for another and never notes that it fights for "democracy," or "constitutional democracy."
It should also be noted that the overwhelming majority of the galaxy appears to oppose the rebellion-- they're a "small band" of rebels, and while the intro of IV alludes to "civil war," it would appear that conditions are indistinguishable from present day life in America had the increased technology been the norm. Therefore, the small band of rebels begs the old adage: one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. By our standards the rebels would be terrorists. They hide in distant, obscure lands (Hoth); they kill innocent people (ermm, I mean, Ewoks) during their attacks on The Man; and, they endorse a religious cult (Han says himself, "hokey religions...are no match for a good blaster at your side"). Additionally, the empire would therefore be considered the United States. They're imperialists, they rule their people by fear, they condone torture to gain intel on rebels, and their industrial/military complex is the largest of everyone's. ... so I guess therefore, the Empire is no more "evil" than we are.
By the way, I noticed the Nazi point. You should google "Godwin's Law." :P Re: Godwin's Law: See http://www.reason.com/news/show/32944.html
I agree that we have become like the Empire in certain ways, but that doesn't quite imply that Al Qaeda et al. have a legitimate grievance akin to the Rebel Alliance justifying their anti-establishment violence. The analogy would only hold true if we forced the entire world to adopt a single fascist government controlled from Washington, in which case the Wahabbists would not be the only group fighting against us. As for the question of what motivates the rebels, it is true that they never allude directly to restoring democracy during this trilogy because lectures about democracy = sleeping audience. The larger context, however, suggests that the rebellion is essentially fighting to restore democracy as practiced in the Old Republic, which, by the way, was nowhere near as theocratic as even the U.S. today. The Jedi never force their wacky religious practices/taboos on anyone, nor are they synonymous with the state, which promptly murders them for opposing its fascist turn. The monarchy of which Leia is a member appears, based on my research, to be confined to Alderaan, and symbolic akin to the U.K.'s. As for the question of the Rebellion's lack of support, this might have more to do with the Empire's habit of brutal repression towards anyone who opposes it than anything else. Speaking of which, as I recall, the motivation for destroying Alderaan was Grand Moff Tarkin's desire to "effectively demonstrate" the power of the Death Star. He had no reason I'm aware of to think there was a base there. So basically the Empire slaughtered millions as a show of power. As for the Endor question, should one actually scroll down to read the entirety of the page you linked to, it refers to the Empire planning to wipe out the Ewoks anyway, without any of the positive benefits accruing from the destruction of DS II. In the end, I suppose it's a matter of perspective, but I think the Empire's motivation (maintaining their hold on power) and the rebels' motivation (restoring freedom to the galaxy) are divergent enough that their actions shouldn't be viewed through the same lens. Evil for its own sake (or in the name of fascist "order") is a different proposition from unavoidable evil in the name of the greater good. |
Currently...Feeling:
![]() By The Way... |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||